Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827420›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

Beyond expectations: exploring the multifaceted role of positive gossip in organizations.

Mustafa Doruk Mutlu, Aynur Çiğdem Ata, Eşe Yıldırım

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mustafa Doruk MutluDepartment of Business Administration, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye.
Aynur Çiğdem AtaDepartment of Business Administration, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye.
Eşe YıldırımDepartment of Business Administration, Yozgat Bozok University, Yozgat, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Gossip is a fundamental aspect of human communication that facilitates the expression of attitudes, beliefs, and opinions related to emotions. Within organizational settings, gossip frequently pertains to third parties who are not physically present and can be classified as either positive or negative based on its valence. This study focuses on positive gossip, specifically how it is perceived and experienced by employees as an organizational phenomenon. Methods: The study employed a phenomenological approach, with data collected through in-depth interviews conducted in two distinct organizational contexts in Türkiye. Results: The findings reveal that positive gossip is a significant phenomenon that can shape organizational dynamics, contributing to motivation, enhanced communication, and a positive workplace climate. However, the results also indicate that when exaggerated, positive gossip may lead to unintended negative outcomes, such as jealousy, perceptions of favoritism, and even potential misuse of power by those being praised. Discussion: This study contributes to the extant literature on organizational communication by offering a comprehensive analysis of the origins, content, circulation patterns, expectations of privacy, and dual impact of positive gossip on individuals and organizations. These insights underscore the necessity for a nuanced understanding of positive gossip, which is complex and multifaceted in nature.

Indexed as

gossiporganizational dynamicspositive workplace gossippublic and academic organizationsqualitative researchSDG 8: decent work and economic growth

Identifiers

PMID42827420
PMCPMC13630514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.