ArticleMolecular ecology2026
Problems With GO Enrichment as an Endpoint for Ecological Omics Interpretation.
Article in Molecular ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gene Ontology (GO) enrichment analysis has been widely adopted for interpretating omics data, including in ecological research. Although valuable for summarizing large gene lists into functional categories, it is often treated as the final interpretive step. In ecological omics, where functional annotations are frequently incomplete and experimental validation is often difficult, this reliance can lead to repetitive, generic conclusions that lack environmental and mechanistic specificity. Although previous literature has addressed the statistical and annotation-related limitations of GO enrichment, its role in shaping the broader interpretive process has received less critical attention. Here, we highlight a conceptual weakness: the treatment of enriched GO terms as definitive biological insight. We focus particularly on ecological studies of non-model organisms in complex, and heterogeneous environments. We discuss complementary strategies, including co-expression network analysis, integration with environmental metadata, phylogenetically informed annotation, and AI-assisted functional inference. To promote more context-sensitive interpretation, we introduce the concept of GO-Deep, which frames GO enrichment as a starting point for integrative, multilayered functional insight. By reframing GO enrichment as an entry point rather than a conclusion, ecological omics can move toward more mechanistically informative and environmentally grounded interpretations of high-throughput data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.