ReviewMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2026
Clinical Epigenomics in Rare Diseases: Interpreting DNA Methylation Episignatures.
Review in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEpigenomic testing complements sequence-based analysis by detecting downstream changes in epigenomic state associated with genetic variation. Genome-wide DNA methylation episignatures are reproducible molecular phenotypes that can serve as biomarkers of specific Mendelian disorders, particularly those involving chromatin regulators, DNA methylation machinery, and transcriptional regulatory pathways.
methodsWe reviewed the biological basis, laboratory methodology, analytical approaches and clinical applications of DNA methylation episignature testing, with emphasis on neurodevelopmental disorders and rare diseases. We also considered current computational tools, limitations of clinical interpretation and emerging epigenomic and epitranscriptomic approaches.
resultsDNA methylation episignature testing is now used clinically to support molecular diagnosis, assist interpretation of variants of uncertain significance and distinguish overlapping neurodevelopmental and chromatin-related disorders. Interpretation integrates methylation-array data, statistical and machine-learning classification, phenotype, genotype and assay-specific validation. Important limitations include tissue specificity, mosaicism, developmental effects, incomplete disorder coverage and dependence on reference datasets. Emerging approaches include tissue-agnostic classifiers, long-read methylation profiling, additional epigenomic signatures and multi-omic integration.
conclusionDNA methylation episignatures provide a clinically useful functional layer of evidence by detecting downstream epigenomic consequences of genomic variation. They should be interpreted as an adjunct to sequence-based diagnosis and clinical assessment rather than as a replacement for either. Continued expansion of reference datasets and integration with other functional genomic approaches should broaden their diagnostic utility.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.