Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827265›Full record

Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2026

Early multimodal vasopressor strategy in septic shock: results of the TRICYCLE randomized controlled trial.

Žiga Kalamar, Giovanni Landoni, Mario Gorenjak, Iva Cestar, Jure Fluher, Marko Horvat, Katja Jerenec, Barbara Kit, Martin Marinšek, Nina Puklavec and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06155812 (Simultaneous Administration of Norepinephrine, Angiotensin II, and Vasopressin in Septic Shock Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06155812 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Simultaneous Administration of Norepinephrine, Angiotensin II, and Vasopressin in Septic Shock Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Medical Centre MariborRan2023 to 2026Enrolled79ConditionsShock, SepticArmsSimultaneous administration of vasopressors, Successive administration of vasopressors
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Žiga KalamarMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia. ziga.kalamar@ukc-mb.si.
Giovanni LandoniAnesthesia and Intensive Care Department, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Mario GorenjakCenter for Human Molecular Genetics and Pharmacogenomics, University of Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Iva CestarMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Jure FluherMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Marko HorvatMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Katja JerenecMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Barbara KitMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Martin MarinšekMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Nina PuklavecMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Franc SvenšekMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Radovan RadonićDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Sara ŠundalićDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Ana Vujaklija BrajkovićDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Andro VujevićDivision of Intensive Care, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
Nina ErjavcInfectious Diseases Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Davor PetekInfectious Diseases Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Alenka Strdin KoširInfectious Diseases Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Evgenija HomšakDepartment of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Maja Cvikl KnehtlCentral Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Andrej MarkotaMedical Intensive Care Unit, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.

Funding

Univerzitetni Klinični Center Maribor Grant No.: OZRD-IRP-2023/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGiven multifactorial mechanisms driving vasodilation in septic shock, there is a strong physiological rationale for early initiation of multiple vasopressors (angiotensin II, vasopressin and norepinephrine) with complementary mechanisms of action. Such an approach could more effectively counteract the complex pathophysiological processes characteristic of septic shock. Here we tested the physiological and clinical effects of an early multimodal vasopressor strategy in patients with septic shock.

methodsWe randomly assigned patients with septic shock receiving ≥ 0.15 µg/kg/min of norepinephrine base to either intervention (early multimodal vasopressor administration: angiotensin II, vasopressin, and norepinephrine) group or control (classic stepwise vasopressor administration: norepinephrine dose increase followed by vasopressin and then by angiotensin II or other vasopressors) group. The primary outcome was change in plasma renin concentrations. This phase II trial was not powered to detect differences in mortality.

resultsA total of 79 patients were included (intervention group: n = 38, control group: n = 41). We observed a faster decline in plasma renin concentrations (2.61% per hour vs. 1.67% per hour; p = 0.015) and lactate concentrations (1.53% per hour vs. 1.01% per hour; p = 0.006) during the first 72 h in the intervention group compared to the control group. At 72 h, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was reduced by 3 points in the intervention group vs. 0 in the control group (p = 0.018). In the additional non-prespecified analyses, norepinephrine equivalent (NEE) dose decreased at a similar rate in the intervention and control groups over 72 h (- 5.41% per hour vs. -5.19% per hour; p = 0.47), whereas over the first 24 h, NEE dose decreased significantly faster in the intervention group (- 6.87% per hour vs. -3.03% per hour; p < 0.0004). The incidence of tachyarrhythmias was significantly lower in the intervention group (15.6% vs. 68.6%; p < 0.01). Intensive care unit mortality (26.3% vs. 41.5%; RR 0.635; 95% CI 0.33 to 1.21; p = 0.235) and 28-day mortality (36.8% vs. 46.3%; RR 0.795; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.35; p = 0.494) were similar.

conclusionEarly multimodal vasopressor therapy with Ang II, vasopressin and norepinephrine in patients with septic shock demonstrated promising physiological effects. These findings provide a rationale for a larger trial to assess whether early multimodal vasopressor therapy improves patient-centered outcomes.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT06155812. URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06155812?term=NCT06155812&rank=1 . Trial registration date: 4 December 2023.

Indexed as

Shock, SepticVasoconstrictor AgentsAgedAngiotensin IIFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedNorepinephrineReninVasopressinsAngiotensin IINorepinephrineReninVasoconstrictor AgentsVasopressinsAngiotensin IICritical careIntensive careNorepinephrineReninSeptic shockVasodilatory shockVasopressinVasopressors

Identifiers

PMID42827265
PMCPMC13633629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.