Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827252›Full record

ArticleBMC global and public health2026

Factors associated with loneliness and social capital in a large volunteer sample of adults in England.

Austen El-Osta, Mahmoud Al-Ammouri, Aos Alaa, Sami Altalib, Agustin Tristán-López, Azeem Majeed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC global and public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Austen El-OstaSelf-Care Academic Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, W12 0BZ, London, UK. a.el-osta@Imperial.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8772-4938
Mahmoud Al-AmmouriSelf-Care Academic Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, W12 0BZ, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-6184-6818
Aos AlaaSelf-Care Academic Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, W12 0BZ, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6130-5092
Sami AltalibSelf-Care Academic Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, W12 0BZ, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7404-8486
Agustin Tristán-LópezSelf-Care Academic Research Unit, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, W12 0BZ, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4214-5390
Azeem MajeedDepartment of Primary Care & Public Health, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, W12 0BZ, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2357-9858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoneliness is a pressing public health concern with wide-ranging impacts on mental, physical and social wellbeing. Building on the Measuring Loneliness in England (INTERACT) Study which represents one of the largest volunteer-based studies of loneliness and social disconnection conducted in the United Kingdom (UK), we explore demographic, social and health-related factors associated with loneliness and social capital, using multiple validated measures.

methodsWe analysed cross-sectional data from 135,725 community-dwelling adults across England. Loneliness was assessed using both the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) 3-item Loneliness Scale and the Office for National Statistics (ONS) Direct Measure of Loneliness (DMOL). Social capital was measured using a composite scale of neighbourhood trust, cohesion and reciprocity. Multivariable ordinal and binary logistic regression models were fitted to summarise mutually adjusted associations within the responding sample. The models were used as exploratory, sample-conditional descriptions and were not intended to estimate population parameters.

resultsYounger age (particularly 16-25 years old), being single, unemployed or living with disability were consistently associated with higher loneliness across both scales. In contrast, respondents reporting nine or more friends had substantially lower odds of loneliness (UCLA: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.09, 95% model-based interval (MBI): 0.09-0.10; DMOL: aOR = 0.16, 95% MBI: 0.15-0.17). University education was associated with higher loneliness on the UCLA scale but lower loneliness on the DMOL. High social capital was more frequently reported among older, married and retired respondents. Respondents with long-term conditions or disability had reduced odds of high social capital (long-term conditions: aOR = 0.82, 95% MBI: 0.80-0.85; disability: aOR = 0.77, 95% MBI: 0.74-0.80).

conclusionsThis study identified several sociodemographic, social and health-related factors associated with loneliness, although some associations varied according to the loneliness measure used. Because participants comprised a non-probability volunteer sample, the estimates should not be interpreted as population parameters, causal effects or confirmatory evidence. The findings are hypothesis-generating and require confirmation in representative, longitudinal and intervention-focused studies.

Indexed as

Community interventionsLonelinessMental healthPublic healthSocial capitalSocial cohesionSocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID42827252
PMCPMC13632327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.