Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827232›Full record

ArticleJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO2026

On Balancing Sharpness of Excitation Patterns, Loudness, and Potential Effects on Speech Perception with Cochlear-Implant Current-Focussing Strategies.

François Guérit, Robert P Carlyon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

François GuéritCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK. Francois.Guerit@mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9404-3575
Robert P CarlyonCambridge Hearing Group, MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, University of Cambridge, 15 Chaucer Road, Cambridge, CB2 7EF, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6166-501X

Funding

Evelyn Trust MED-25-2328Medical Research Council G116768
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeCochlear implant (CI) users struggle to understand speech under noisy conditions. This has long been attributed to channel interactions: a given neuron not only responds to electrical stimulation from the closest electrode but also is sensitive to stimulation from electrodes located further away. Shaping the stimulation voltage into a very sharp profile (e.g. using tripolar instead of the more common monopolar stimulation) has been proposed as a solution, only with limited success. We argue this is due to several factors: the strong correlation between envelopes of adjacent CI channels with speech sounds, the necessity to recruit enough neurons for sufficient loudness, and, at loud levels, the similarity between monopolar and sharp stimulation output voltages at locations that are at least 3-4 electrodes away from a given stimulation electrode.

methodsWe describe a "Hilltop" method to effectively reduce the voltage more than 3-4 electrodes away from a given electrode, while keeping the same percept of place pitch as with monopolar stimulation. We assess this method psychophysically in human CI users (N = 7 males, 9 females) and with computational modelling.

resultsBased on computational modelling and on psychophysical measures of charge summation, we show that the voltage difference between monopolar and Hilltop stimulation persists at the level of the spiral ganglion neurons.

conclusionsThe results warrant investigations with more complex, multichannel stimuli. We also describe possible limitations of this strategy, including the presence of sidelobes of opposite effective polarity in some participants, and suggest ways to mitigate their effects.

Indexed as

Channel interactionsCochlear implantsCurrent focussing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.