ArticleCJEM2026
Healthcare providers' experiences with police in Atlantic Canadian emergency departments: a qualitative study.
Article in CJEM, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesPolice involvement is common in emergency departments (EDs), yet evidence from Canada on its impact on care is limited. This study described how ED healthcare providers experience and manage police presence, focusing on perceived impacts on patient care, safety, confidentiality, and training needs.
methodsEmergency physicians, nurses, and paramedics were recruited through the Atlantic Emergency Research Organization network using purposive and snowball sampling. Focus groups were conducted via Webex using a semi-structured topic guide. Sessions were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified. Data were analyzed using an interpretivist grounded theory-informed thematic approach with iterative open, axial, and selective coding. Four investigators reviewed the coding decisions and theme development.
resultsTwenty participants attended focus groups. Participants described police involvement in ED and prehospital encounters, including mental health crises, trauma, intoxication, and criminal legal presentations. Police were often required for managing rising violence and providing practical assistance, yet their presence and actions sometimes escalated agitation, delayed care, or created pressure for rapid "medical clearance." Confidentiality and ethical boundaries were major concerns. Officers positioned for safety could compromise privacy and clinicians reported uncertainty about what information could be shared outside mandated reporting. Most participants reported limited formal training and called for clearer policies, decision tools, and joint training with police and EMS.
interpretationPolice presence in EDs was experienced as simultaneously protective and problematic. Clearer institutional frameworks, operational guidance on information sharing, and joint training with law enforcement are required to support safe, ethical, and trauma-informed emergency care when police are involved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42827224What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.