Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827215›Full record

ArticleBehavior research methods2026

A beta way: A tutorial on Bayesian beta regression for psychological research.

Jason Geller, Robert Kubinec, Chelsea M Parlett Pelleriti, Matti Vuorre

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior research methods, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jason GellerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, Boston College, McGuinn 300, Chestnut Hill, MA, 2467, USA. drjasongeller@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7459-4505
Robert KubinecTexas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6655-4119
Chelsea M Parlett PelleritiChapman University, Orange, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9301-1398
Matti VuorreTilburg University, Tilburg, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5052-066X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rates, percentages, and proportions are common outcomes in psychology and the social sciences. These outcomes are often analyzed using models that assume normality, but this practice overlooks important features of the data, such as their natural bounds at 0 and 1. As a result, estimates can become distorted. In contrast, treating such outcomes as beta-distributed respects these limits and can yield more accurate estimates. Despite these advantages, the use of beta models in applied research remains limited. Our goal is to provide researchers with practical guidance for adopting beta regression models, illustrated with an example drawn from the psychological literature. We begin by introducing the beta distribution and beta regression, emphasizing key components and assumptions. Next, using data from a learning and memory study, we demonstrate how to fit a beta regression model in R with the Bayesian package {brms} and how to interpret results on the response scale using the packages {marginaleffects} and {easystats}. We also discuss model extensions, including zero-inflated, zero- and one-inflated, and ordered beta models. Basic familiarity with regression modeling and R is assumed. To promote wider adoption of these methods, we provide detailed code and materials at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15830595 . For researchers preferring a frequentist framework, we include an appendix demonstrating equivalent analyses using {glmmTMB}.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalPsychologyBayes TheoremHumansRegression AnalysisBeta distributionBeta regressionLearning and memoryPsychologyR tutorial

Identifiers

PMID42827215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.