Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2026
Continuous infusion of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor is associated with an advantage in neutrophil recovery in pediatric oncologic disorders.
Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe use of intensified chemotherapy has significantly improved overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) in cancer patients. However, it also increases the risk of chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly used to hasten neutrophil recovery, but limited research has focused on the superiority of different routes of G-CSF administration. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a randomized, prospective, single-institution study. Twenty-eight participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to experimental and control arms in a 1:1 ratio. At the end of the study, 20 cases were eligible for statistical analysis. The primary endpoint was the duration from the onset of neutropenia to steady neutrophil recovery. Secondary endpoints included the safety profile, 7-day emergency return rate, and the occurrence of infectious or febrile events.
resultsThe mean duration from CIN to neutrophil recovery was 6.2 days in the intravenous drip (IVD) group and 7.6 days in the intravenous injection (IVI) group (P = 0.0068). The mean difference between the two groups was 1.4 days. A significantly lower incidence of febrile neutropenia (FN) was observed in the IVD group compared to the IVI group (15% vs. 50%, P = 0.0407). Adverse effects (AEs) were comparable between the two groups.
conclusionsThe IVD route of G-CSF administration leads to faster neutrophil recovery and reduces the risk of FN. All evaluable AEs are comparable between the two groups. These findings suggest that the IVD route may be a preferable option for optimizing supportive care in cancer patients with CIN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.