ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2026
Serum cholinesterase as a prognostic marker in respiratory critical illness: a narrative review.
Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prognostication in respiratory critical care rests largely on composite severity scores derived from mixed medical, surgical or sepsis populations. Serum butyrylcholinesterase (pseudocholinesterase) is a liver-synthesized plasma enzyme, a negative acute-phase reactant and an established index of hepatic synthesis and nutrition, and has re-emerged as a candidate prognostic biomarker in critical illness. A direct cytokine-driven mechanism is inferred, not demonstrated, and whether the circulating enzyme modulates the cholinergic anti-inflammatory axis is unproven. This narrative review synthesizes the evidence across community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and acute respiratory failure including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). A reproducible inverse association between enzyme activity and mortality or disease severity emerges, but it rests on small, mostly retrospective single-center studies with heterogeneous assays and data-derived thresholds. The review therefore asks one decisive question, almost never addressed in respiratory cohorts: whether the enzyme adds information beyond albumin and established severity scores, judged by incremental discrimination and reclassification. On that test it is a consistent signal in search of methodological rigour rather than an established independent marker. Prospective, setting-specific and adequately adjusted validation is required before clinical adoption, capturing the activity nadir and the slope of any recovery, whose prognostic role is untested. Mislabelling could influence decisions on escalation and limitation of treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42827170What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.