Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42827119›Full record

Articlenpj biodiversity2026

A framework for unit-level biodiversity credit integrity and market-level governance.

Lara Marie Pelka, Megan Meacham, Hassan Aftab Sheikh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in npj biodiversity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lara Marie PelkaDepartment of Sustainable Development, Environmental Science and Engineering, School of Architecture and the Built Environment, Kungliga Tekniska högskolan, 100 44, Stockholm, Sweden.
Megan MeachamStockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden. megan.meacham@su.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3626-967X
Hassan Aftab SheikhSmith School of Enterprise and the Environment, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX1 3QY, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5807-3232

Funding

Mistra - the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Environmental Research DIA 2020/10
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biodiversity credits (BCs) are one innovative financing scheme that the Global Biodiversity Framework proposes to mobilise private capital and narrow the biodiversity financing gap. BCs and the voluntary biodiversity markets (VBMs) around them are nascent, offering an opportunity to learn from shortcomings of the adjacent voluntary carbon markets and design them for both ecological and social integrity from the outset. This paper examines the requirements for the effective functioning of BCs and VBMs at the unit and market levels. We propose a requirements framework based on a horizon scan and semi-structured interviews with market participants. Key five unit-level criteria, comprising four environmental integrity criteria (measurement and monitoring, durability, additionality and leakage minimisation) and one social integrity criterion (environmental and social safeguards), are proposed. At the market level, three components underpin functioning VBMs: clearly defined, fairly allocated and easily transferable rights. Building on lessons from carbon markets, we derived mitigation measures to guide the development of an improved market architecture.

Identifiers

PMID42827119
PMCPMC13633254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.