Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42826377›Full record

ArticleJMIR serious games2026

Gamified Assessment of Medication Literacy in School-Aged Children: Instrument Development and Validation Study.

Qingqing Liu, Lihua Cheng, Guanfu Liu, Jieli Peng, Zhiyu Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR serious games, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qingqing Liu *Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6018-1730
Lihua ChengChildren's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8488-7095
Guanfu LiuIndependent Researcher, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8115-1094
Jieli PengNanjing Gulou No.1 Central Primary School, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3299-1850
Zhiyu Wang *Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8006-0886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAssessing medication literacy in children is essential for evaluating school-based health education, yet traditional measurement tools often fail to engage children, compromising data quality. Gamified assessments offer an alternative, but their psychometric properties, comparability to conventional formats, and responsiveness to intervention effects require systematic evaluation.

objectiveThis study developed and evaluated a gamified assessment tool for measuring medication literacy across 4 domains (knowledge, attitude, perceived behavioral control, and behavioral intention) in elementary school children through 3 sequential phases: psychometric validation, methodological comparison with a paper-based questionnaire, and application to interventions.

methodsThree independent cohorts were recruited from a single elementary school in Nanjing, China, using cluster random sampling of intact classes (grades 4-6). We adapted the CHERRIES (Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys) framework. Phase 1 (40/81, 49.4% female) includes content validity via 2 rounds of expert review, construct validity using Rasch analysis, and 1-month test-retest reliability. Phase 2 (42/85, 49.4% female) includes a randomized crossover design (10-minute washout), equivalence assessed with an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Bland-Altman analysis, decision consistency, and superiority using the chi-square test (data quality) and 2-tailed independent t tests (enjoyment and preference on 5-point Likert scales). Phase 3 (41/85, 48.2% female) includes a single-group pre-post design, with responsiveness evaluated using generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs) with random intercepts. Analyses used R software with an α of .05.

resultsPhase 1 had perfect content validity (scale-level content validity index/average [S-CVI/Ave]=1.00), and the Rasch analysis supported unidimensionality (eigenvalues 2.14-2.25, ratios 0.34-0.40) and item fit (mean infit/outfit mean-square [MNSQ] 0.83-1.23). The test-retest ICCs were 0.76 to 0.92 (95% CI 0.64-0.95). Phase 2 equivalence was confirmed (ICC 0.94-0.99, 95% CI 0.90-0.99; κ=0.87-0.97). Validity rates were 100% (42/42, 95% CI 91.6%-100%) for gamified vs 90.7% (39/43, 95% CI 77.4%-96.9%) for paper (P=.13). The gamified tool yielded higher enjoyment (mean 4.26, SD 0.94 vs mean 2.46, SD 0.85; Cohen d=2.00, 95% CI 1.46-2.55; P<.001) and preference (mean 4.29, SD 0.83 vs mean 2.82, SD 0.97; Cohen d=1.62, 95% CI 1.11-2.13; P<.001). Phase 3 GLMMs showed time effects for attitude (β=1.74, 95% CI 1.25-2.22; P<.001), perceived behavioral control (β=2.86, 95% CI 2.18-3.53; P<.001), behavioral intention (β=2.33, 95% CI 1.51-3.15; P<.001), and knowledge (incidence rate ratio [IRR]=1.52, 95% CI 1.22-1.89; P<.001); time × class interactions were nonsignificant (all P≥.19), indicating consistent changes across classes. Effect sizes were moderate to large (Cohen d=0.70-1.53, 95% CI 0.36-1.97).

conclusionsThis study develops and validates a gamified assessment tool for children's medication literacy across 3 independent phases, including a randomized crossover comparison with a paper-based format. Unlike child health measures relying on adult proxy reports or adapted adult scales, our child-centered tool was directly validated with students and designed to enhance engagement. The psychometrically sound tool achieves measurement equivalence while offering a pediatric health-promotion outcome measure. The tool can support school-based medication literacy programs and advance health equity by detecting consistent improvements across diverse classrooms.

Indexed as

childrengamified assessmentmedication literacymethodological comparisonpsychometric validationresponsiveness

Identifiers

PMID42826377
PMCPMC13675683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.