ArticleJMIR human factors2026
Integrating Wearable Technology in Digital Therapy for People With Psychosis (SloMo): Mixed Methods Co-Design and Feasibility Study.
Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Digital health interventions for psychosis, like SloMo, leverage smartphone technology to help transfer learning from therapy to real-life situations. Usage relies on motivation, recall, and awareness. Wearable devices that track physiological signs of stress can boost engagement by encouraging the use of coping strategies when most needed. Objective: This study aims to co-design an integrated user interface for wearable technology and the SloMo mobile app, and explore its usability, acceptability, engagement, and preliminary clinical outcomes for individuals with psychosis through a feasibility study. Methods: A co-design team developed the wearable augmented SloMo app using the Double Diamond framework. The team included 10 experts by experience based across three UK National Health Service (NHS) mental health trusts, who had completed SloMo as part of a randomized controlled trial, and were purposively recruited to ensure a range of demographic backgrounds. Users tested the app for 8 consecutive weeks during a 5-month data collection period in 2018, providing feedback that guided iterative improvements. Self-reported engagement, usability, and acceptability were collected through quantitative ratings and interviews, evaluated through qualitative content analysis. Assessments of paranoia and well-being were completed pre- and post use, summarized descriptively, with change scores calculated and evaluated for reliable change. Results: The Spire Stone clothing-adhered biosensor, which monitors respiratory rate and stress physiology, was chosen to augment SloMo. A minimum viable product of an integrated interface was developed. Feedback identified that users needed the technology to be easy to use, secure, and tailored to them through user control. Eight (8/10, 80%) users reported that the wearable prompted increased use of the SloMo app's features and other coping strategies. Self-reported engagement varied according to EBE user experience of the technology: higher use of the technology (n=3) was associated with higher usefulness (25% reduction in paranoia, SD 6%) and acceptability (84% satisfaction, SD 13%). Conversely, individuals that engaged with the device less (n=7) did not find it as useful (11% increase in paranoia, SD 17%) and were only modestly satisfied (63%, SD 20%). Conclusions: Wearable technology is acceptable and can be integrated with a digitally supported therapy for psychosis to promote engagement and potentially support management of difficulties. However, further development work is needed to ensure acceptability and usefulness across a broader range of user needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.