Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42826354›Full record

ArticleJMIR human factors2026

Utility of Augmented Reality Glasses With Waveguide Optics and Facial Recognition Technology for Patient Verification in a Simulated Outpatient Setting: Physician Questionnaire Survey Study.

Ryo Andy Ogasawara, Soichiro Yoshida, Kentaro Okamoto, Eiki Nagaoka, Hirotaka Sagawa, Kazutaka Sumita, Hajime Tanaka, Satoshi Shiraga, Tomohiro Amemiya, Yasuhisa Fujii

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR human factors, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ryo Andy OgasawaraDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan, 81 3-5803-5295, 81 3-5803-5295.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1177-8789
Soichiro YoshidaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan, 81 3-5803-5295, 81 3-5803-5295.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2757-8083
Kentaro OkamotoDepartment of Pediatric Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0102-8462
Eiki NagaokaDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3768-8692
Hirotaka SagawaDepartment of Endovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8476-7721
Kazutaka SumitaDepartment of Endovascular Surgery, Institute of Science Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1348-1099
Hajime TanakaDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan, 81 3-5803-5295, 81 3-5803-5295.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3632-2901
Satoshi ShiragaCellid, Inc, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1490-0686
Tomohiro AmemiyaDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Institute of Science Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2710-8949
Yasuhisa FujiiDepartment of Urology, Institute of Science Tokyo, 1-5-45 Yushima, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan, 81 3-5803-5295, 81 3-5803-5295.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6761-3229

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Augmented reality (AR) glasses with waveguide optics and facial recognition may enhance patient identification and clinical workflows. However, their usability among physicians has not yet been evaluated. Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the usability and acceptability of prototype AR glasses with facial recognition in a simulated outpatient setting. Methods: In May 2025, 14 urologists from a single institution tested prototype AR glasses developed by Cellid Inc. The device incorporates waveguide-based optical displays, a miniature camera, and deep learning-based facial recognition software. Physicians identified preregistered mock patients, with demographic and clinical data displayed on the right lens. After the trial, participants completed an anonymous questionnaire on usability, comfort, visibility, and self-reported symptoms using 3- or 5-point Likert scales. Results: Eleven participants (79%; 95% CI 52%-92%) found the device helpful in performing clinical procedures, and 12 (86%; 95% CI 60%-96%) believed it improved patient safety. Most participants adapted quickly to wearing the device, and 79% (95% CI 52%-92%) expressed a willingness to use it in future practice. Four of 13 respondents (31%; 95% CI 13%-58%) selected "somewhat tired" for eye fatigue, and only 1 participant experienced minor and transient physical symptoms including headache and nausea. Three of 13 respondents (23%; 95% CI 8%-50%) rated the glasses as slightly heavy, and among the 5 participants who wore prescription glasses, 4 (80%; 95% CI 38%-96%) reported difficulty wearing the prototype over their glasses. Surrounding-environment visibility and perceived facial recognition responsiveness were generally favorable; however, 8 of 13 respondents (62%; 95% CI 36%-82%) rated the displayed patient information as slightly difficult to see. Conclusions: In this pilot study, AR glasses with facial recognition were well accepted by physicians. This technology has demonstrated perceived clinical utility and has the potential to assist medical professionals, though further refinement and larger clinical evaluations are needed.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityAutomated Facial RecognitionEyeglassesFacial RecognitionPhysiciansSmart GlassesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and Questionnairesaugmented realityautomated facial recognitiondata displaypatient caresmart glasses

Identifiers

PMID42826354
PMCPMC13632967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.