Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42826264›Full record

ArticleMedicine2026

Challenges in glaucoma diagnosis in small optic discs: An OCT-based analysis.

Serap Yildiz, Seyda Ugurlu Karadeniz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Serap YildizDepartment of Ophthalmology, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-5966-5336
Seyda Ugurlu KaradenizDepartment of Ophthalmology, İzmir Katip Celebi University, Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4057-3984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to assess how optic disc (OD) size influences structural and functional tests in patients with glaucoma with small and normal-sized discs and to compare the sensitivities of these tests. The study comprised 182 eyes, including 109 eyes of 73 patients diagnosed with glaucoma and 73 eyes of 41 healthy subjects. Eyes were classified according to OD size as either small (<1.6 mm2) or normal (1.6-2.1 mm2). Optic nerve head parameters, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, and macular ganglion cell analysis were assessed using Cirrus 4000 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The sensitivities of RNFL, macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), and visual field parameters were evaluated using logistic receiver operating characteristic regression analysis. The mean ages of the patients and controls were 65.48 ± 7.94 years and 65.22 ± 6.55 years, respectively (P = .859). The mean disc diameter was 1.48 ± 0.11 mm in the small-disc group and 1.86 ± 0.16 mm in the normal-disc group. The mean deviation values were -5.52 ± 4.81 and -4.54 ± 3.73 in the small- and normal-disc groups, respectively (P = .268). Among patients with glaucoma and small ODs, GCIPL parameters (mean, minimum, superior, and inferior hemifield values) demonstrated greater sensitivity than RNFL parameters. In contrast, RNFL parameters (average, superior, inferior, and corresponding hemifield values) showed greater sensitivity than GCIPL parameters in patients with normal-sized ODs. Macular structural parameters demonstrated higher sensitivity for glaucoma diagnosis in patients with small ODs. However, a comprehensive assessment integrating both macular and peripapillary structural parameters may improve diagnostic accuracy by providing complementary information in these patients.

Indexed as

GlaucomaOptic DiskTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve FibersRetinal Ganglion CellsROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityVisual Fieldsglaucomaoptic disc sizeROCsmall optic discstructural and functional tests

Identifiers

PMID42826264
PMCPMC13633033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.