ArticleMedicine2026
Challenges in glaucoma diagnosis in small optic discs: An OCT-based analysis.
Article in Medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to assess how optic disc (OD) size influences structural and functional tests in patients with glaucoma with small and normal-sized discs and to compare the sensitivities of these tests. The study comprised 182 eyes, including 109 eyes of 73 patients diagnosed with glaucoma and 73 eyes of 41 healthy subjects. Eyes were classified according to OD size as either small (<1.6 mm2) or normal (1.6-2.1 mm2). Optic nerve head parameters, peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, and macular ganglion cell analysis were assessed using Cirrus 4000 spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. The sensitivities of RNFL, macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GCIPL), and visual field parameters were evaluated using logistic receiver operating characteristic regression analysis. The mean ages of the patients and controls were 65.48 ± 7.94 years and 65.22 ± 6.55 years, respectively (P = .859). The mean disc diameter was 1.48 ± 0.11 mm in the small-disc group and 1.86 ± 0.16 mm in the normal-disc group. The mean deviation values were -5.52 ± 4.81 and -4.54 ± 3.73 in the small- and normal-disc groups, respectively (P = .268). Among patients with glaucoma and small ODs, GCIPL parameters (mean, minimum, superior, and inferior hemifield values) demonstrated greater sensitivity than RNFL parameters. In contrast, RNFL parameters (average, superior, inferior, and corresponding hemifield values) showed greater sensitivity than GCIPL parameters in patients with normal-sized ODs. Macular structural parameters demonstrated higher sensitivity for glaucoma diagnosis in patients with small ODs. However, a comprehensive assessment integrating both macular and peripapillary structural parameters may improve diagnostic accuracy by providing complementary information in these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.