ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2026
Robotic-assisted simulation of eyelid laceration repair: A proof-of-concept study.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the feasibility and safety of using the Da Vinci robotic surgical system for simulated eyelid laceration repair in a controlled experimental setting.
methodsA proof-of-concept simulation study was conducted using gloves and sponge. Fingers of gloves were cut and sponges were introduced in the lumen to mimic the architecture of eyelids. These sponge-filled gloves were placed over a goats eye and fixed with pins on a Thermocol block. Anterior lamellar wounds were created by cutting only the superior part of the gloves. Full thickness wounds were created by cutting the full thickness of the glove. An ophthalmologist with prior cumulative robotic training of 12 hours on a virtual robotic surgical simulator performed wound repair using the Da Vinci surgical system. Repair was carried out using 6-0 silk sutures for anterior lamellar wound in an interrupted fashion, and the full thickness margin involving wound was repaired in three layers using 4-0 silk, 6-0 silk, and 6-0 vicryl. Procedural time, accuracy of suturing, and intraoperative safety parameters were assessed.
resultsMultiple interrupted sutures were successfully placed in both the simulated upper and lower eyelid anterior lamellar wounds. The total time required for completion of suturing was 12 minutes. Full thickness wound was repaired by passing a mattress at the margin, and interrupted sutures in layers for simulated tarsus and skin. No unintended contact with the cornea or globe was observed during the procedure. Wound edge approximation was satisfactory in both eyelids, and robotic instrument control allowed precise needle placement in the confined periocular workspace.
conclusionsThis proof-of-concept study demonstrates the technical feasibility and safety of robotic-assisted eyelid laceration repair in a simulated environment. With prior simulator-based robotic training, ophthalmologists may effectively perform delicate periocular suturing using the Da Vinci system. These findings support further preclinical and translational studies exploring the role of robotic platforms in oculoplastic and ophthalmic trauma surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.