ReviewIndian journal of ophthalmology2026
Biosimilars in diabetic macular edema: Promise, progress, and pitfalls.
Review in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common microvascular complication of diabetes and a major cause of vision impairment. Intravitreal vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors remain the gold standard for its management. However, the high cost and limited accessibility of reference anti-VEGF agents have driven growing interest in biosimilars-biologic therapies designed to match the efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of their reference products. Following the expiration of patents for agents such as aflibercept and ranibizumab, several biosimilars have been developed, approved, and introduced into clinical practice. Evidence from real-world studies-including RE-ENACT2 (REal-life assessmENt of safety And effeCTiveness of Razumab) and REAR-RD2 (REal-world observational study to evaluate the risk factors in the management of REtinal Diseases-2)-as well as randomized clinical trials such as INSIGHT and CT-P42 has demonstrated clinical equivalence between these biosimilars and their reference anti-VEGF counterparts in the treatment of DME. This article provides an updated overview of the current evidence base, recent advances in regulatory pathways, and ongoing challenges in integrating biosimilars into routine DME management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.