Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42826022›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Perceptions of Telemedicine Use for Specialist Care in Skilled Nursing Facilities.

Gillian K SteelFisher, Mary G Findling, Eran N Ben-Porath, Andrew D Wilcock, Ateev Mehrotra, David C Grabowski, Michael L Barnett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gillian K SteelFisherDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mary G FindlingDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Eran N Ben-PorathSSRS, Glen Mills, Pennsylvania.
Andrew D WilcockDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Ateev MehrotraDepartment of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
David C GrabowskiDepartment of Health Care Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michael L BarnettDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: For long-term residents of skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), greater use of telemedicine for specialist care may improve access to and overall quality of care. Although policy changes during the COVID-19 pandemic facilitated greater use of telemedicine, such use now is rare, and it is unclear why. Objective: To examine SNF clinical leaders' perceptions of telemedicine use and explanations of lower use among long-term residents. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study was conducted online and via postal mail from February 7 to July 28, 2025, among directors of nursing of SNFs, the central decision-makers for daily clinical operations. A probability-based sample was drawn from a listing of all 14 084 SNFs in the US, stratified to ensure reach to facilities of different sizes and varying telemedicine utilization. Main Outcomes and Measures: This study measured the perceptions of key factors associated with quality of care in SNFs. Telemedicine use for specialist care and reasons for telemedicine use and disuse were solicited from SNFs' directors of nursing. The demographic characteristics of SNFs surveyed were weighted to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services benchmarks to reflect the profile of SNFs nationally. Results: Among 1001 directors of nursing sent invitation letters, 379 (39%) participated in this study. Most directors of nursing whose residents used telemedicine confirmed its proposed advantages: respondents said a top reason for using telemedicine is that it helped less-mobile patients get appointments (77%; 95% CI, 71%-82%) and that it helped improve patients' quality of care (73%; 95% CI, 67%-78%). Top reasons for not using telemedicine among less-frequent users and nonusers were: telemedicine visits were not frequently offered by specialists (73%; 95% CI, 67%-79%) and telemedicine did not offer higher quality of care over normal practices (62%; 95% CI, 56%-68%). A majority of directors of nursing who use telemedicine (60%; 95% CI, 54%-65%) also reported that telemedicine placed additional time burdens on nursing staff. Conclusions and Relevance: This survey study found that frontline clinical leaders view specialist telemedicine care as a useful tool for SNFs, particularly for patients with low mobility. However, they reported that telemedicine is offered too infrequently by specialists and adds to nurses' schedules. Policy and payment reforms should include incentives for specialists to offer telemedicine and reimbursement for nursing staff time.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelSkilled Nursing FacilitiesTelemedicineCOVID-19FemaleHumansMaleNursing Home ResidentsQuality of Health CareSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42826022
PMCPMC13633543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.