ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2026
The Building and Application of a Machine Learning Model on Predicting Euploid Blastocysts in IVF Treatments Without PGT-A.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Embryologists could not know whether blastocysts were euploid or not in in-vitro fertilization treatments without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy. However, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy technology which might impair the developmental potency of blastocysts was in strict limitation in China. Therefore, a non-invasive method was necessary for embryologists to select euploid embryos as far as possible. A machine learning model based on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy results, development dynamics, morphology of blastocysts and female age was built by two-logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the model was 0.877. The accuracy rate, precision rate, recall rate, f-score, true negative rate, false positive rate, false negative rate of the model when performed in independent data set were 77.35%, 77.49%, 72.55%, 74.94%, 81.55%, 18.45%, 27.45%, respectively. Besides, the false positive rate of the model on predicting euploid blastocysts was significantly lower than Gardner grade and KIDScore D5. When selected blastocysts by the model, the frozen embryo transfer outcomes improved significantly than the frozen embryo transfer outcomes which selected blastocysts by Gardner selection. The predictive model had potency in selecting euploid blastocysts in in-vitro fertilization treatments without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42825985What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.