ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2026
Relieving pain with OnabotulinumtoxinA in refractory burning mouth syndrome: protocol and outcomes of an exploratory case series.
Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBurning mouth syndrome (BMS) is a chronic orofacial neuropathic pain disorder, occurring in the absence of clinically evident mucosal lesions or identifiable oral pathology that can explain the symptoms. A significant proportion of patients experience uncontrolled symptoms despite multiple therapies. OnabotulinumtoxinA (onaBoNT/A) is used in neuropathic pain, as clinical trials have shown benefits in peripheral and central neuropathic pain management with its application. We present an exploratory case series of four patients with refractory BMS treated with intradermal onaBoNT/A injections.
methodsFour patients with refractory BMS were included in this study. OnaBoNT/A intradermal injections were performed in the inner labial mucosae and tip of the tongue. We assessed pain intensity before the procedure and after 15 days, adverse effects, time to symptom recurrence, cumulative effects with multiple procedures, and patients' global impression of change.
resultsAll patients reported the procedure was quick and well tolerated. No immediate adverse effects were identified. All patients had significant pain reduction at 15-day follow-up assessment. Regarding adverse effects, one patient reported transient lower lip asymmetry in one procedure, and another reported transient mild mouth closure impairment. Symptoms recurred between 2.5 and 3.0 months after the first procedure. Three patients desired to continue the treatment. One patient reported no symptom recurrence after four procedures with three-month intervals; after four procedures, the treatments were suspended, and she remained asymptomatic until the end of follow-up. One patient reported incremental benefit from repeated procedures. All patients reported the treatment had a meaningful impact on their daily life.
conclusionsOur results suggest that intradermal onaBoNT/A injections may constitute an effective and durable treatment option for patients with BMS refractory to conventional therapies. Despite these favourable outcomes, adverse events were noted in procedures targeting the labial mucosa. In future applications, we aim to examine technical variations between sessions associated with and without adverse effects, to optimise safety and refine the technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42825945What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.