SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Structured exercise and cardiac outcomes during anthracycline or anti-HER2 therapy in breast cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate whether structured exercise, compared with usual care, preserves left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), global longitudinal strain (GLS), and cardiac biomarkers in women with breast cancer receiving anthracyclines and/or anti-HER2 therapy.
methodsWe performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Risk of bias was assessed with the revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2), and certainty of evidence with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. When clinically and methodologically comparable, effects were pooled as net differences in change (ΔEG - ΔCG) using random-effects models. The primary synthesis was restricted to the baseline-to-end-of-anthracycline-treatment window (~ 4 months).
resultsSeven trials (9 reports; n = 513) were included. Most trials had some concerns or high risk of bias. Quantitative synthesis was feasible in only two trials. No between-group differences were observed for LVEF (MD 0.07, 95% CI - 1.38 to 1.52; I
conclusionCurrent randomized evidence is sparse, heterogeneous, and of low certainty. Available data do not confirm a consistent cardioprotective effect of exercise on LVEF or GLS and do not permit conclusions about clinical cardiovascular events, survival, or HFpEF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42825938What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.