Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42825895›Full record

SynthesisIndian pediatrics2026

Comparison of Molecular Methods With Culture for Identifying Microbial Etiology in Pediatric Empyema Thoracis: A Systematic Review of Diagnostic Test Accuracy.

Abhishek Purohit, Pallab Chatterjee, Hema Mittal, Madhu S Pujar, Sanjiv Singh Rawat, Pranita Pradhan, Joseph L Mathew

Abstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Indian pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abhishek PurohitAdvanced Centre for Evidence Based Child Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Pallab Chatterjee *Department of Pediatrics, Apollo Multispeciality Hospital, Kolkata, India.
Hema Mittal *Department of Pediatrics, ABVIMS and Dr. RML Hospital, New Delhi, India.
Madhu S Pujar *Department of Pediatrics, JJM Medical College, Davanagere, India.
Sanjiv Singh Rawat *Department of Pediatrics, Child Care Clinic, Indore, India.
Pranita PradhanAdvanced Centre for Evidence Based Child Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Joseph L MathewAdvanced Centre for Evidence Based Child Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India. dr.joseph.l.mathew@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2866-2623

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research Nil
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextDetermining the microbial etiology in children with empyema thoracis can guide optimal treatment of individual children, and rational antimicrobial use in institutions. Culture methods and molecular diagnostic technologies are available, but there is no evidence-based guideline addressing the optimal diagnostic technology.

objectiveThis systematic review was undertaken to compare molecular diagnostic methods with culture methods for determining microbial etiology in children with empyema. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Literature search was undertaken in seven databases and four clinical trial registries, to identify diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies or diagnostic randomized controlled trials, comparing molecular methods with culture, for establishing the microbiological etiology of empyema. The outcomes were diagnostic accuracy parameters. Risk-of-bias and certainty of evidence were evaluated using the GRADE approach.

resultsNine DTA studies were included, however data from eight could be pooled. The pooled sensitivity of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in pleural fluid specimens was 0.98 (95% CrI 0.91-0.99), and specificity 0.49 (95% CrI 0.19-0.75). The likelihood ratio of a positive result (LR+) was 1.90 (95% CrI 1.20-3.88), whereas LR- was 0.05 (95% CrI 0.01-0.23). Positive predictive value ranged from 0.11 to 1.0, and negative predictive value from 0.90 to 1.0. The diagnostic odds ratio was 38.23 (95% CrI 5.66-231.81). The overall risk of bias and overall applicability concerns were low in 3/8 studies and unclear in 5/8. The certainty of evidence was very low.

conclusionPleural fluid PCR has high sensitivity compared to culture, but moderate specificity. The optimal choice needs considerations beyond the comparative diagnostic accuracy.

Indexed as

Empyema, PleuralMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesChildHumansPolymerase Chain ReactionSensitivity and SpecificityDTA reviewEmpyema thoracisPCRPleural fluid

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.