ReviewGeroScience2026
Mapping the evolution of dual-task paradigms in cognitive aging: A bibliometric analysis of research landscapes and translational applications.
Review in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The increasing burden of dementia highlights the need for sensitive and ecologically relevant tools for early detection and intervention. Dual-task (DT) paradigms have emerged as promising approaches for assessing cognitive-motor alterations. This study aimed to map the 22-year evolution of DT research in cognitive aging using bibliometric analysis. We retrieved 1347 articles from the Web of Science Core Collection (January 2003-February 15, 2025) and analyzed them using CiteSpace. Co-citation, keyword burst, and collaboration network analysis were performed to identify research evolution, hotspots, knowledge structures, and international collaborations. Research showed a progressive shift from gait-focused behavioral assessment (2003-2012) to neuroimaging-based investigations (2013-2018), and subsequently toward artificial intelligence-driven, ecologically valid approaches integrating virtual reality and multimodal sensing (2019-2025). The dual-task cost emerged as a potential candidate digital biomarker associated with neural alterations and cognitive decline, while its complementary value to traditional cognitive assessment was highlighted. Dual-task training demonstrated potential benefits for improving functional outcomes and reducing fall risk; however, heterogeneity in treatment effects indicates the need for personalized intervention strategies. DT paradigms are evolving toward potential applications in precision gerontology. The proposed assessment-intervention continuum provides a conceptual framework for future research. Standardized protocols and prospective validation of DT-derived digital phenotypes are required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42825889What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.