Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42825846›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2026

Condylar Bone Remodeling After TMJ Disc Repositioning Using Sutureless Screws Versus Suture Anchors for Anterior Disc Displacement Without Reduction: A Prospective Cohort Study.

Chunmei Li, Xingyu Lyu, Jiannan Zhao, Zhipeng Wang, Nan Jiang, Yiru Wang, Pinyin Cao

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chunmei Li *State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of Orthognathic and TMJ Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Fifth Clinical Medical College of Henan University of Chinese Medicine (Zhengzhou People's Hospital), Zhengzhou, Henan, 450000, China.
Xingyu Lyu *State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of Orthognathic and TMJ Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Jiannan ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of Orthognathic and TMJ Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Zhipeng WangState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of Orthognathic and TMJ Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Nan JiangState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of Orthognathic and TMJ Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Yiru WangState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Temporomandibular Joint, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China.
Pinyin CaoState Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases & National Center for Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Department of Orthognathic and TMJ Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China. woshicin@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5237-4870

Funding

the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 82301109
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTemporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc repositioning is an effective treatment for anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDWoR). This study aimed to evaluate the 12-month bone remodeling outcomes following sutureless repositioning screw fixation and to explore whether there is a significant difference in condylar bone remodeling compared with suture anchor fixation.

methodsThis single-center prospective cohort study included patients with MRI-confirmed ADDWoR who underwent TMJ disc repositioning and fixation between June 2022 and December 2024. Patients were categorized into the sutureless repositioning screw group and the suture anchor group according to the fixation method. All patients underwent cone-beam computed tomography preoperatively (T0) and after 12 months postoperatively (T1). The primary outcome was condylar height. Secondary outcomes included condylar length and width; anterior, superior, and posterior joint spaces; glenoid fossa thickness; condylar osseous degeneration score; assessment of condylar osseous changes; and new bone formation. Continuous postoperative outcomes were analyzed using linear mixed-effects models with a patient-level random intercept, adjusting for the corresponding baseline value, age group, and fixation technique. Generalized estimating equations with patient-level clustering were used for the osseous degeneration score and binary remodeling outcomes. Age-by-technique interactions were additionally examined.

resultsA total of 69 patients (102 TMJs) were included, comprising 36 patients (55 joints) treated with sutureless repositioning screws and 33 patients (47 joints) treated with suture anchors. Both groups demonstrated favorable postoperative osseous remodeling over 12 months. In adjusted mixed-effects models, fixation technique was not independently associated with condylar height or any secondary continuous outcome. For the primary outcome, neither age group (β=0.237, 95% CI -0.068 to 0.542; P=0.128) nor fixation technique (β=0.192, 95% CI -0.104 to 0.489; P=0.204) was significantly associated with condylar height at T1. Age was independently associated with greater glenoid fossa thickness (β=0.408, 95% CI 0.137 to 0.678; P=0.003), a lower postoperative osseous degeneration score (β=-0.614, 95% CI -0.882 to -0.345; P<0.001), and higher odds of osseous improvement (OR=4.699, 95% CI 1.650 to 13.379; P=0.004). The association between age and new bone formation did not reach statistical significance (OR=3.168, 95% CI 0.958 to 10.473; P=0.059). No significant age-by-technique interaction was observed for any evaluated outcome.

conclusionSutureless repositioning screw fixation achieved reliable condylar bone remodeling outcomes at the 12-month follow-up, with no independent difference detected compared with suture anchor fixation after adjustment. Age may be associated with selected postoperative bone remodeling outcomes, and adolescent patients tended to show more favorable remodeling in some measures than adults. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: No independent difference in 12-month osseous remodeling was detected between sutureless screw and suture anchor fixation after adjustment. Age was associated with selected remodeling outcomes but should not determine fixation technique or surgical timing.

Indexed as

Bone RemodelingBone ScrewsJoint DislocationsMandibular CondyleSuture AnchorsTemporomandibular Joint DiscTemporomandibular Joint DisordersAdultCone-Beam Computed TomographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnterior disc displacement without reductionCondylar bone remodelingCone-beam computed tomographyDisc repositioningSuture anchorSutureless repositioning screwTemporomandibular joint

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.