ReviewNeurosurgical review2026
Glymphatic system dysfunction in central nervous system malignancies: A narrative review.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The hypothesis of the glymphatic system as playing an important part in clearing waste from the brain has revolutionized our understanding of cerebrospinal and interstitial fluid dynamics in the brain. This review explores current knowledge of central nervous system (CNS) malignancies and their implications in the glymphatic system function. Here, we synthesize all available preclinical and clinical evidence on glymphatic dynamics in CNS malignancies. The human data evaluated (gliomas, meningiomas, peritumoral edema, and cerebral metastasis) constitute the total scope of current research. We conducted a systematic search in the PubMed database for studies published between 1 January 2015 and 1 January 2026. We selected 22 studies based on their relevance regarding brain tumors and their relationship to glymphatic system dysfunction. In contrast to animal studies that rely on contrast-enhanced imaging, human studies predominantly use the diffusion tensor imaging along perivascular spaces (ALPS) index due to its noninvasive nature and feasibility with multidirectional diffusion-weighted imaging, which is available on most clinical scanners. However, interpretation of the findings remains the subject of debate, particularly regarding the influence of microstructural factors and other parameters on index values. Consequently, current approaches increasingly assess the ALPS index as a potential indirect marker of glymphatic function alongside complementary MR-based techniques, including multiparametric mapping, volumetry, free water estimation, and DTI-derived microstructural measures. Further research in CNS tumors is required to clarify consistent patterns and address the variability of reported findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.