ArticleJournal of anesthesia2026
Sugammadex versus no pharmacological reversal under quantitative neuromuscular monitoring: a propensity score-matched analysis of postoperative pulmonary complications.
Article in Journal of anesthesia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSugammadex may reduce postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs). However, its association with PPCs remains unclear when quantitative neuromuscular monitoring (NMT) is routinely used, and comparisons with spontaneous recovery are limited. We compared PPCs between cases receiving sugammadex and those receiving no reversal agent.
methodsWe included adult noncardiac surgical cases from 2010 through 2020. Eligible cases involved rocuronium administration and removal of the airway device in the operating room. The primary outcome was postoperative pneumonia within 30 days. Secondary outcomes were respiratory failure, ventilatory support, reintubation, and mortality within 30 days. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed using patient characteristics and intraoperative factors. Outcomes were compared using conditional logistic regression. We also evaluated achievement of a train-of-four (TOF) ratio ≥0.9 at airway-device removal and performed a supplementary propensity score-matched analysis restricted to cases meeting this threshold.
resultsAfter matching, each group included 5677 of the 26,621 eligible cases. Postoperative pneumonia occurred in 72 cases (1.3%) in the no-reversal group and 87 (1.5%) in the sugammadex group, with no significant between-group difference (odds ratio [OR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89-1.69; P = 0.22); no secondary outcome differed significantly between groups. Achievement of a TOF ratio ≥0.9 was more frequent in the sugammadex group. The supplementary analysis likewise showed no significant between-group differences.
conclusionUnder routine quantitative NMT, sugammadex administration was associated with more frequent achievement of a TOF ratio ≥0.9 but not with lower incidences of postoperative pneumonia or secondary outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42825817What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.