ArticleEFORT open reviews2026
External fixation in severe open tibial shaft fractures: indications, orthoplastic strategy, and infection-aware decision-making.
Article in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intramedullary nailing remains the preferred definitive fixation for most open tibial shaft fractures once contamination is controlled and soft tissues permit internal implantation. External fixation should be chosen according to intent: damage control, preservation of orthoplastic access, staged bridge to internal fixation, or definitive frame-based reconstruction. Temporary frames are most useful in polytrauma, vascular injury, severe swelling, gross contamination, and wounds needing serial debridement, flap planning, or negative-pressure therapy. Conversion to intramedullary nailing is appropriate only when margins are declared, coverage is complete or reliably scheduled, contamination is controlled, and fracture-related infection (FRI) is not suspected. Definitive circular or hybrid fixation is favored when repeated excision, vascular repair, segmental bone loss, bone transport, uncertain margins, or suspected/established FRI makes buried metal less attractive. Successful frame treatment requires safe pin placement outside flap and implant corridors, restoration of length, axis, and rotation without distraction, timely soft-tissue coverage, and standardized infection and pin-site pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.