ArticleeGastroenterology2026
Dynamic prediction of the development of extrahepatic organ failures in ICU patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
Article in eGastroenterology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Extrahepatic organ failure (EOF) is a critical determinant of short-term mortality in patients with decompensated cirrhosis within the intensive care unit (ICU). However, traditional prognostic tools are largely static and fail to capture the rapidly fluctuating physiological characteristic of critical illness. This study aimed to develop and validate a dynamic artificial intelligence (AI) framework to provide real-time predictions of the presence of ≥2 EOF 12 hours later. Methods: We analysed adult patients with decompensated cirrhosis from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV; derivation) and eICU Collaborative Research Database (eICU-CRD; external validation). Using a late-fusion architecture, we combined risk estimates from a machine-learning model and a deep-learning model. Both models incorporated longitudinal vital signs and non-time-series clinical variables, using summary features and sequential vital signs, respectively. The model processed 45 variables subsequently refined to 14 key predictors. The sliding-window framework combined hourly vital signs (6-hour dynamic window), recent laboratory parameters (24-hour window) and current organ failure status. The model continuously incorporated newly available data to predict the presence of ≥2 EOF 12 hours later. Performance was evaluated via area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), calibration and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The derivation cohort included 1486 patients, with 1666 patients in the external validation cohort. The optimal late-fusion configuration paired a CatBoost model trained after synthetic minority over-sampling technique (SMOTE) resampling with a deep-learning model combining fully convolutional networks and gated recurrent units (FCN-GRU). The combined model achieved an AUROC of 0.830 (95% CI 0.783 to 0.876) at the 12-hour prediction horizon. The model demonstrated strong calibration (intercept -0.027) and consistent net clinical benefit across relevant probability thresholds in DCA. Sensitivity analyses showed stable performance across 6-hour (AUROC 0.821) and 24-hour (AUROC 0.834) prediction horizons as well as within the sepsis subgroup (AUROC 0.820). Robust discriminative capability was maintained in external validation (AUROC 0.774, 95% CI 0.743 to 0.805). Conclusion: By tracking continuously evolving physiological trajectories, this AI-driven approach accurately predicts EOF in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. It provides reliable risk estimates 12 hours ahead, serving as a dynamic alternative to conventional static risk scores.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.