ArticleBMJ public health2026
Towards meaningful engagement: theoretical approaches guiding the participation of people living with multiple long-term conditions in health research - a scoping review.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The rising prevalence of multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs), largely driven by non-communicable diseases (NCDs), presents complex healthcare challenges. Evidence suggests that meaningful engagement of people with lived experience can improve intervention relevance, health outcomes and equity. Theories, frameworks and models (TFMs) may provide structured approaches to support such engagement among people living with MLTC (PLwMLTC). Objectives: To identify TFMs informing engagement strategies for PLwMLTC. Design: Scoping review followed the Arksey and O'Malley and Levac Data sources: PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL and Embase databases were searched on 20 December 2024 without date restrictions. Eligibility criteria: Studies describing TFMs adopted to support engagement and involvement of PLwMLTC and community members. Data extraction and synthesis: Data were extracted using a predefined charting form and synthesised narratively. Results: Of 756 articles screened, 25 met inclusion criteria. Commonly adopted TFMs included the Chronic Care Model, Collaborative Care Model, Health Belief Model, Transtheoretical Model, Patient-Centred Medical Home, Improving Mood-Promoting Access to Care Model and Patient-Centred Care Model. These TFMs facilitated meaningful engagement through patient education, behaviour change programmes, community-based care, peer support and coordinated provider-patient interactions. Evidence linked several TFMs to improvements in clinical outcomes (eg, blood pressure and depression), while others primarily influenced sociobehavioural dimensions. Persistent challenges concerned heterogeneity in integrating engagement within health systems and limited evidence on contextual adaptation across diverse settings, particularly in relation to NCD-driven MLTC. Conclusions: TFMs provide structured approaches to engage PLwMLTC meaningfully, through behaviour change strategies, multidisciplinary care coordination and community network strengthening. Effective implementation relies on ensuring cultural relevance and alignment with local health system capacities. Future research should focus on adaptation, implementation, sustainability, scalability and equity across diverse settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.