ArticleBMJ public health2026
Adolescent effective access to sexual and reproductive health and rights in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review of legal, institutional and sociocultural barriers.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Despite significant global efforts and advancements over the past few decades regarding adolescents' effective sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR), sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) continues to face a disproportionately high burden of adverse outcomes. Although there is a growing presence of favourable legal and policy frameworks, adolescents' effective access to these rights remains limited by multiple structural barriers. This significant and persistent disparity calls for an imperative strategic examination of the complex interplay among the institutional, legal and sociocultural factors and determinants that impede adolescents' access to SRHR. Objectives: The study aimed to identify and examine legal, institutional and sociocultural barriers that hamper adolescents' access to effective SRHR. Design: We followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 guidelines and the PICOS (Populations, Interventions, Comparasion, Outcomes, Study design) framework. Data sources: An extensive search of scholarly databases identified 41 relevant publications from 2011 to 2026. Methodological quality was assessed according to the study type. Thus, we used Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) for purely qualitative studies, STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) for observational studies and MMAT (Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool) for mixed methods studies. Eligibility criteria: Literature review includes qualitative, quantitative and mixed-methods studies. Studies conducted in sub-Saharan African countries and published from 2000 to 2026. Data extraction and synthesis: Data extraction grid (Excel) constituted of study identity, methodological characteristics, SRHR dimension covered, barriers, emergent features, innovative practices and policy implications. Results: We found a persistent and critical gap between the formal recognition of sexual and reproductive rights through multiple ratifications and their effective implementation through practical mechanisms and procedures in SSA. This review demonstrated how legal, social and institutional barriers interact and entangle to produce structural inequalities, particularly affecting adolescent girls and vulnerable women. Progress made over the past two decades in SSA remains significant. An excellent international and national commitment worth noting. The review, however, uncovered some fragilities in this progress and an uneven distribution. Conclusions: The effectiveness of SRHR in SSA requires a strategic, integrated approach that combines normative reform, the consolidation of governance mechanisms, social norm transformation and the strengthening of health systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.