ArticleCureus2026
Delayed Constrictive Pericarditis Following Presumed Esophagopericardial Communication After Esophageal Stenting.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophagopericardial fistula is a rare but life-threatening complication of esophageal stenting and malignancy. Although acute purulent pericarditis is a well-recognized consequence, delayed presentation as constrictive pericarditis years after the initial insult is exceptionally uncommon. A 74-year-old woman presented with a two-month history of progressive dyspnea. She had undergone esophageal stent implantation for esophageal cancer two years earlier, followed by chemoradiotherapy. Transthoracic echocardiography demonstrated preserved biventricular systolic function and constrictive physiology without significant pericardial effusion. Chest computed tomography revealed dense pericardial fluid containing air bubbles, raising suspicion of an esophagopericardial communication. However, contrast-enhanced computed tomography with both oral and intravenous contrast failed to demonstrate an active fistulous tract. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging confirmed constrictive physiology with septal bounce. The patient underwent surgical pericardiectomy, during which a large amount of firm, white, cheese-like purulent material was evacuated. Microbiological culture of the pericardial specimen grew
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.