ArticleCase reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery2026
Staged multimodal correction of implant rippling after prepectoral breast reconstruction with thin mastectomy flaps: a case report.
Article in Case reports in plastic surgery & hand surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Rippling is a recognized aesthetic complication of prepectoral implant-based breast reconstruction, and thin mastectomy flaps markedly increase its risk. We report a 35-year-old physically active woman with recurrent bilateral fibroadenomas who underwent bilateral nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy with immediate prepectoral implant reconstruction; the prepectoral plane was chosen to avoid animation deformity, weighed against her thin flaps. Visible rippling attributable to thin soft-tissue coverage developed at three months. Autologous fat grafting gave only partial, temporary correction. Four months later, a single staged, combined procedure achieved definitive correction: bilateral exchange to highly cohesive silicone gel implants, conversion to a subpectoral pocket, Wise-pattern mastopexy, and adjunctive lipofilling, with a right local inferior-pedicle rotation flap correcting a medial contour defect. At 12 months, rippling had resolved with a satisfactory aesthetic outcome. Thin flaps were considered the principal contributing factor, although a single case cannot establish causation. Because prepectoral reconstruction relies on the soft-tissue envelope for implant camouflage, thin flaps may favor considering primary subpectoral or dual-plane placement, or planned soft-tissue support such as acellular dermal matrix or autologous coverage. Salvage addresses the determinants of rippling in combination: fat grafting to thicken tissue, pocket conversion to add muscular coverage, mastopexy to tighten the skin envelope, and exchange for a more cohesive implant, although simultaneous performance precludes isolating any single component's contribution. Thin mastectomy flaps appear to be an important risk factor, potentially informing patient selection. Once rippling occurs, a staged multimodal approach can restore contour.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.