Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42825223›Full record

ArticleCureus2026

Assessment and Standardization of Follow-Up Notes Among Healthcare Providers in the Internal Medicine Unit at Mek Nimir Hospital: A Two-Cycle Clinical Audit From February to December 2025.

Mohamed Osman Elhag Osman, Abdelhameed Awad, Mohamed F Mohamed, Awad Osama Kamal Ibrahim, Ahmed Mahmoud Sidahmed Abdullah, Ammar Osman, Mohamed Alfatih E Omer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohamed Osman Elhag OsmanInternal Medicine, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, SDN.
Abdelhameed AwadInternal Medicine, Omdurman Teaching Hospital, Omdurman, SDN.
Mohamed F MohamedOrthopaedic Surgery, Burjeel Hospital, Abu Dhabi, ARE.
Awad Osama Kamal IbrahimMedicine and Surgery, Elrazi University, Khartoum, SDN.
Ahmed Mahmoud Sidahmed AbdullahPulmonary Medicine, Aswan University Hospitals, Aswan, EGY.
Ammar OsmanGeneral Practice, Al Mamoon Medical Center, Al Ain, ARE.
Mohamed Alfatih E OmerEmergency Department, Omdurman Teaching Hospital, Omdurman, SDN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complete follow-up notes support continuity of care by communicating the patient's current symptoms, objective findings, clinical assessment, and management plan. This clinical audit evaluated whether a standardized Background, Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Plan (BSOAP) format could improve the completeness of inpatient follow-up documentation in the Internal Medicine Unit at Mek Nimir Hospital. A prospective before-and-after, two-cycle clinical audit was conducted using unpaired groups of inpatient follow-up notes. The baseline cycle reviewed 42 notes from February 10 to October 1, 2025. After introduction of a standardized BSOAP format, focused staff teaching, and feedback on documentation gaps, the re-audit reviewed 14 notes from December 1 to December 25, 2025. Each note was assessed for the five BSOAP domains and for complete documentation of all five domains. Two-sided Fisher's exact tests were used to compare proportions because the cycle samples were unpaired, unequal in size, and included small or zero cell counts. Subjective documentation increased from 0/42 (0.0%) at baseline to 14/14 (100.0%) at re-audit, Assessment documentation increased from 7/42 (16.7%) to 13/14 (92.9%), and complete BSOAP documentation increased from 0/42 (0.0%) to 11/14 (78.6%); all three changes were statistically significant (p<0.001). Objective and Plan documentation remained at 100.0% in both cycles. Background documentation decreased from 42/42 (100.0%) to 12/14 (85.7%), but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.059). A structured BSOAP follow-up format supported by focused teaching and audit feedback was associated with substantial improvement in documentation completeness. Continued use of the format and repeated audit cycles are needed to sustain the improvement and address the remaining gaps in Background and Assessment documentation.

Indexed as

bsoapclinical auditclinical documentationdocumentation qualityfollow-up notesinternal medicinepatient safetysudan

Identifiers

PMID42825223
PMCPMC13629828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.