ArticleOpen medicine (Warsaw, Poland)2026
Predictive performance of blood urea nitrogen, cystatin C, and their ratio for in-hospital mortality in sepsis: a Chinese two-center analysis.
Article in Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Early identification of septic patients at high risk of mortality is crucial for improving outcomes. Renal function indicators such as blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and cystatin C (Cys C) have been individually associated with sepsis outcomes. However, the comparative prognostic value of these indicators and their ratio remained unclear. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study in two hospitals in China. Associations between renal indicators and mortality were examined using multivariable logistic regression, restricted cubic spline modelling, and threshold analysis. Discrimination was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), evaluated both individually and in combination with the SOFA score. Clinical applicability was examined with calibration and decision curve analyses. Results: A total of 1,039 patients were included in this study. After adjustment for covariates, multivariable logistic regression identified both BCR (OR 1.247, 95 % CI 1.165-1.335, p<0.001) and BUN (OR 1.047, 95 % CI 1.029-1.065, p<0.001) as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality among patients with sepsis, and these findings were replicated in the independent external cohort. In the exploration cohort, both BCR and BUN exhibited nonlinear associations with mortality risk. Incorporating BCR into the SOFA score resulted in the highest overall predictive performance (AUC 0.717) and the greatest net clinical benefit (0.106). Reclassification analyses further demonstrated that BCR achieved higher NRI and IDI values than BUN or Cys C, and that adding BCR to the SOFA score improved both NRI and IDI compared with SOFA alone. Conclusions: BCR and BUN were independently associated with in-hospital mortality in patients with sepsis. BCR showed modestly better prognostic performance than BUN or Cys C alone, and its integration with SOFA may provide supplementary risk-stratification information. However, BCR should not be considered a replacement for established severity scores, and further prospective validation is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.