ArticlePerspectives on medical education2026
The Faculty Development Paradox: Applying Competency-Based Education Principles to Faculty Development.
Article in Perspectives on medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Competency-based health professions education (CBHPE) has transformed learner education through explicit competencies, sequenced progression, direct observation, coaching, and programmatic assessment. However, faculty development-the mechanism that should prepare educators to enact CBHPE-has not undergone a parallel evolution. This misalignment limits the effectiveness and sustainability of CBHPE. In this paper, the authors propose a model of Competency-Based Faculty Development (CBFD) that applies CBHPE design principles to the growth of educators and introduces the Master Adaptive Teacher (MAT) as a developmental outcome for faculty. Using Van Melle's five core components of CBHPE as an organizing framework, the authors synthesized existing educator competency frameworks, literature on adaptive expertise, faculty development theory, and implementation science and mapped these components to faculty development structures, strategies, and assessment processes. The core components can be directly translated to faculty development. Implementing CBFD requires (1) defining educator competencies aligned with institutional roles, (2) building developmental pathways linked to outcomes, (3) integrating flexible, workplace-based learning and coaching, (4) designing instruction that models CBHPE principles, and (5) adopting a longitudinal assessment program using multiple data sources. The MAT framework further operationalizes adaptive expertise as a core capability developed through reflection, coaching, community, and system-level support. In summary, CBFD represents a structural redesign that positions faculty as learners within a developmental ecosystem. When aligned with culture and institutional infrastructure, CBFD strengthens educator identity, enhances teaching quality, and enables CBHPE to achieve its full potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.