ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Peer mentorship for physically injured veterans in healthcare settings during ongoing military conflict: benefits and barriers.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peer mentorship by individuals with lived experience is increasingly recognized as supporting recovery after severe injury. Yet evidence on its role in hospital-based rehabilitation remains limited, particularly in cases of severe war-related physical injury during ongoing military conflict. This study examines the benefits and barriers of peer mentorship within the Israel Defense Forces Casualties Affairs Unit, which trains previously injured veterans to accompany newly injured soldiers during hospitalization in healthcare settings as part of their reserve duty. Methods: The study employed a qualitative design, comprising 41 in-depth interviews: 21 with severely injured soldiers (with amputations, traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, burns, polytrauma) who were assigned peer mentors, and 20 with parent-caregivers. Interviews underwent linguistic and thematic analyses. Results: Peer mentorship was found to support recovery across three domains: functional (independent functioning, exercising rights, community participation), social-emotional (fostering hope, belonging, trust, and mediation of re-entering the public space), and cognitive (autonomous choice, insight, identity reconstruction, and developing an effective mindset when interacting with others). Barriers were also identified across three domains: technical-functional (matching and timing issues), emotional (managing rejection, shattering the illusion of full recovery, appearance-related avoidance), and cognitive (discrepancies in worldviews). Conclusion: Integrating peer mentorship into the post-acute continuum of care facilitates recovery of severely injured soldiers and their families but requires careful implementation. Healthcare systems and rehabilitation units may integrate peer mentorship as part of their comprehensive support framework. The study's significance lies in the need to develop diverse responses for war casualties following military conflicts worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.