ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2026
Digital Analysis of Occlusal Contacts in Angle Class II and Class III Malocclusion.
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the number, interocclusal distance categories, and spatial distribution of occlusal contacts per subject in Angle Class II and Class III malocclusions using digital intraoral models. Materials and Methods: This exploratory, cross-sectional study evaluated 60 untreated subjects (30 Class II, 30 Class III). Digital models were obtained via the Medit i600 intraoral scanner, and contact analysis was performed using the Medit Occlusion Analyzer software. Variables represented the cumulative number of teeth per subject. Data were analyzed using median and interquartile range (IQR). Intergroup comparisons were performed using Mann-Whitney U tests (α = 0.05), with effect size estimated using rank-biserial correlation (rB). Results: Premolar contacts showed no significant intergroup differences regarding interocclusal distance (p > 0.05). However, Class III subjects exhibited significantly more molar contacts within the 0.050-0.100 mm distance range (p = 0.018). Full-surface contacts were significantly more frequent in Class II patients for both premolars (p = 0.002) and molars (p = 0.007). Class II subjects also showed a highly significant complete absence of molar contacts (p < 0.001). Palatal distribution of premolar contacts showed a borderline difference (p = 0.044), interpreted as a clinical trend. Conclusion: Digital analysis revealed specific patterns in the interocclusal distance and distribution of occlusal contacts in Angle Class II and Class III malocclusions. Intraoral scanning provided objective geometric data that can serve as a valuable adjunct for individualized treatment planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.