ArticleActa stomatologica Croatica2026
Depth of Curve of Spee in Relation to Craniofacial and Dental Morphology.
Article in Acta stomatologica Croatica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To quantify the depth of the Curve of Spee (CoS) in untreated orthodontic patients, evaluate its variations across Angle classifications, and identify its skeletal and dental morphological correlates. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed digital intraoral scans and lateral cephalograms of 240 untreated orthodontic patients (age range: 13-17 years). Subjects were categorized into four groups: Angle Class I, Class II/1, Class II/2, and Class III. CoS depth was measured using OrthoCAD, while skeletal and dental variables were assessed via AX.Ceph software. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc tests, Pearson's correlation coefficients, and multiple linear regression analysis to identify primary predictors of CoS depth. Results: The mean CoS depth was 2.18 mm. Significant intergroup differences were observed, with the greatest depth recorded in Class II/2 (2.49 mm) and the shallowest in Class III (1.82 mm). CoS depth demonstrated significant positive correlations with overbite, overjet, ANB angle and Wits appraisal. Conversely, an inverse relationship was found with vertical skeletal parameters. A multivariate regression analysis identified overbite and sagittal skeletal indicators as the most relevant predictors of CoS depth. Conclusion: The depth of the CoS is critically influenced by sagittal skeletal discrepancies and incisal relationship (overbite), with vertical craniofacial morphology playing a secondary role. These findings highlight its relevance in orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. And the need for the individualized mechanics for CoS leveling based on the patient's specific skeletal and dental phenotype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.