ArticleCase reports in neurology
Delayed Aneurysmal Rupture following Flow Diverter Placement despite Adjunctive Coiling: Case Report.
Article in Case reports in neurology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Flow diverters significantly alter the inflow dynamics of an aneurysm, leading to both qualitative and quantitative changes in the intra-aneurysmal hemodynamic environment (AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Aug 1;35(8):1567-73). Case Presentation: A 65-year-old woman with a giant left internal carotid artery aneurysm causing visual symptoms underwent treatment with coiling, Surpass Evolve flow diverter placement, and balloon angioplasty. Despite being on dual antiplatelet therapy, she developed in-stent thrombosis on postoperative day 4, leading to neurological symptoms. Intra-arterial thrombolysis with eptifibatide and tenecteplase achieved near total recanalization and initial clinical improvement. However, she subsequently developed a massive subarachnoid hemorrhage and was declared brain dead the next day. Conclusion: Delayed rupture of an aneurysm following Surpass Evolve flow diverter embolization is a rare complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. In our case, in-stent thrombosis occurred on postoperative day 4 and subsequently progressed to aneurysmal rupture, despite the presence of coils within the aneurysm sac. Rupture on the fourth day after Surpass Evolve flow diverter placement - despite initial coil embolization - along with aneurysmal thrombosis, partial recanalization, thrombus extension into the parent vessel, and subsequent treatment with intra-arterial eptifibatide and tenecteplase highlights the profound hemodynamic instability in giant aneurysms that can contribute to post-procedural rupture.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.