ReviewOxford open neuroscience2026
The neural basis of explicit and implicit emotion regulation: a coordinate-based meta-analysis.
Review in Oxford open neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Emotion regulation (ER) is a transdiagnostic factor in psychopathology. However, research heavily dominates explicit emotion regulation, leaving implicit mechanisms poorly understood. We investigated whether explicit and implicit emotion regulation, conceptually differentiated by the explicitness of their regulatory goals, exhibit distinct neural signatures. We conducted a coordinate-based activation-likelihood estimation meta-analysis comprising 79 explicit (2961 subjects) and 29 implicit (1329 subjects) ER experiments among healthy subjects, utilizing a rigorous leave-one-out (LOO) sensitivity analysis to ensure spatial robustness. Explicit ER engaged left-lateralized frontoparietal network, robustly activating the inferior, superior, and middle frontal gyri, as well as the middle and superior temporal gyri. In contrast, implicit ER recruited a bilateral network involving subcortical integration hubs and emotional reactivity areas, specifically the insula, cingulate gyrus, caudate, and lentiform nucleus. Conjunction analyses revealed that shared neural engagement was limited primarily to the bilateral insula and right inferior frontal gyrus. Explicit ER recruits regions responsible for goal-directed behaviors while implicit ER targets regions related to emotion and affect processing. The difference between implicit and explicit emotion regulation may lie in the level of consciousness involved. This suggests that clinical interventions could be optimized by targeting these disparate networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.