Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824957›Full record

ArticleBMJ public health2026

Burden of cancer attributable to six occupational exposures in the Netherlands, 2021: a health impact assessment study.

Tosca O E De Crom, Iris Eekhout, Ellian Lebbink, Caren Lanting, Susan Peters, Anjoeka Pronk, Calvin Ge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tosca O E De CromUnit Health & Work, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6869-043X
Iris EekhoutUnit Health & Work, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, Netherlands.
Ellian LebbinkUnit Health & Work, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, Netherlands.
Caren LantingUnit Health & Work, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9417-7074
Susan PetersUtrecht University Institute for Risk Assessment Sciences, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Anjoeka PronkUnit Health & Work, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, Netherlands.
Calvin GeUnit Health & Work, Netherlands Organization for Applied Scientific Research, Leiden, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Although numerous occupational exposures are known to be carcinogenic, the extent to which they contribute to the cancer burden in the Netherlands remains unclear. We estimated the annual cancer burden attributable to six occupational carcinogens in the Netherlands for 2021. Methods: We selected occupational exposures and related cancer sites classified as group 1 human carcinogens by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, focusing on the six with the highest cancer burden in a UK study. These exposures include asbestos, respirable crystalline silica, diesel engine exhaust, solar ultraviolet (UV) radiation and painter- and welder-related occupational exposures. Population attributable fractions (PAFs), representing the proportion of cancer cases attributable to these exposures, were calculated using Levin's equation. Input data included the proportion of the population exposed during the relevant exposure period (1971-2011), derived from data from Statistics Netherlands; and relative risks for each exposure-cancer site combination, obtained from existing literature. Cancer incidence data in 2021, obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry, were multiplied by the PAFs to estimate the total numbers of attributable cases. Results: In 2021, an estimated 3932 cancer cases (3.1% of all cases) were attributable to the six occupational exposures, with a greater proportion in men (5.4%) than in women (0.5%). Solar UV radiation contributed to the most cases (1720 squamous cell carcinomas of the skin), followed by asbestos (925 lung cancers, 463 mesotheliomas, 10 ovarian cancers, 9 laryngeal cancers), painter-related exposures (156 lung cancers, 83 bladder cancers), welder-related exposures (201 lung cancers, 11 ocular melanomas), respirable crystalline silica (233 lung cancers) and diesel engine exhaust (187 lung cancers). Conclusions: Occupational exposures contribute to the cancer burden in the Netherlands, especially among men. Solar UV radiation and asbestos result in the highest numbers of attributable cancers. Targeted exposure control could substantially reduce this preventable cancer burden.

Indexed as

Community HealthOccupational MedicinePublic Health

Identifiers

PMID42824957
PMCPMC13630016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.