ReviewInternational journal of dentistry2026
Diagnostic Efficiency of Artificial Intelligence Integrated Intraoral Mobile Photographs in Identification of Oral Potentially Malignant Disorders: An Umbrella Review.
Review in International journal of dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) are precursors to oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC), a malignancy with high morbidity and mortality due to late diagnosis. Conventional diagnostic methods, though accurate, are invasive and often inaccessible in resource-limited areas. Intraoral mobile photographs integrated with artificial intelligence (AI) as a screening tool may offer a noninvasive, cost-effective, and accessible alternative for early detection of OPMDs. The study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of mobile photographic models in identifying OPMDs. Settings and Design: An umbrella review synthesizing evidence from previously published systematic reviews/meta-analyses was carried out following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Methods and Material: Databases including PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of Science, and through supplementary search engines like Google Scholar were searched. Inclusion criteria encompassed studies analyzing the diagnostic performance of mobile photographic models for OPMDs. Sensitivity, specificity, and applicability were examined. Results: The pooled sensitivity was 90% (95% CI: 88.8%-92.6%) and specificity was 89% (95% CI: 86%-92%). Minimal heterogeneity in sensitivity ( Conclusions: Intraoral mobile photographs were effective in noninvasive OPMD detection, particularly in low-resource settings. Further research should aim to refine algorithms, standardize imaging, and validate performance in real-world scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.