ArticleBMJ public health2026
Socioeconomic inequalities in physical activity among children and adolescents in the UK and Ireland: a scoping review mapping evidence from 2015 to 2025.
Article in BMJ public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Regular physical activity (PA) in childhood and adolescence provides health benefits. Levels of PA among children and adolescents are influenced by a range of factors, some of which are well-established, including sex and age; however, evidence regarding the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and PA remains equivocal, yet children from lower-income households are often less active than their more affluent peers. In the UK and Ireland, despite national policies promoting PA, evidence on how socioeconomic inequalities in moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) have changed over time, including during the COVID-19 pandemic, remains limited. This scoping review aimed to map the extent and nature of research on socioeconomic differences in child and adolescent MVPA. Design: The review followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines and was prospectively registered on the Open Science Framework. Data sources: Studies were identified through seven electronic databases, hand-searching, grey literature and expert recommendations. Eligibility criteria: Inclusion criteria were participants aged 0-18 years, inclusion of MVPA outcomes and socioeconomic indicators and data collection between 2015 and 2025 within the UK and Ireland. Data extraction and synthesis: Two reviewers independently screened and extracted data, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Findings were synthesised numerically and thematically, focusing on MVPA measures, SES and temporal trends. Results: Of 6735 identified studies, 26 met inclusion criteria. Evidence for socioeconomic differences in MVPA was mixed. Only one study using device-measured MVPA identified a socioeconomic gap, while self-reported or proxy-reported measures more frequently indicated disparities. No consistent trends in SES differences over time were observed. Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence that socioeconomic inequalities in MVPA among children and adolescents in the UK and Ireland have changed over time. Observed disparities may reflect methodological differences, particularly variations in socioeconomic indicators and MVPA measurement methods, contributing to inconsistent findings. However, causal explanations cannot be established, highlighting the need for longitudinal research using consistent SES indicators and device-based MVPA measures. Registration: Robinson, S., O'Kane, M., Carlin, A., Reilly, J., Mackintosh, K., & Basterfield, L. (2025, May 12). The socioeconomic gap in physical activity for children and adolescents in the UK and Ireland, has it changed over time? A scoping review. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/2UCSY.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.