ArticleCureus2026
Ultrasound-Guided Distal Thoracolumbar Fascia Hydrodissection at the Gluteal Junction: A Technical Report With Cadaveric Assessment of Compartmental Spread and Gross Neural Sparing.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chronic low back pain with radiating lower-extremity symptoms in the absence of clear radiculopathy or major central canal stenosis remains a common diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. In patients with radiating low back pain without a convincing compressive correlate, posterior myofascial structures may be considered among several potential contributors; however, the present report evaluates the anatomical feasibility of a distal thoracolumbar fascia (TLF) hydrodissection approach rather than a clinical pain generator. We developed an ultrasound-guided hydrodissection technique targeting the distal TLF deep to the gluteus maximus and inferior to the sacroiliac joint. This technical report describes the clinical rationale, procedural technique, and cadaveric dye-spread assessment of injectate distribution and gross neural sparing. The technique was developed for a selected clinical context characterized by chronic low back pain radiating to the posterior thigh or calf, intact motor function, and lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings that may include fatty infiltration of the lower lumbar multifidus, with or without involvement of the gluteal origin region, after limited or unsustained benefit from standard image-guided interventions. For the described clinical technique, the symptomatic side would receive 10 mL of injectate prepared to a final concentration of 15% dextrose with 0.1% lignocaine. For cadaveric assessment, three fresh-frozen cadavers (two male, one female; mean age 74.3 years) underwent bilateral ultrasound-guided injection of the same target plane, yielding six injected sides. Each side received 10 mL of undiluted 1% methylene blue. Layered dissection demonstrated cephalad spread to approximately the L3 level in six out of six sides (100%). Multifidus staining occurred in six out of six (100%) and longissimus thoracis staining in six out of six (100%), whereas iliocostalis lumborum staining occurred in 0 out of six (0%). Partial proximal sacrotuberous ligament staining was observed in six out of six (100%). No gross dye was observed in the sciatic nerve, sacral plexus, neural foramina, or epidural space in 0 out of six sides (0%). In this fresh-frozen cadaver model, ultrasound-guided injection at the distal TLF-gluteal junction was technically achievable and produced a consistent gross cephalad dye-spread pattern toward the posterior fascial-paraspinal region. Because both sides of each cadaver were injected, the present design was not intended to determine contralateral crossover. These cadaveric findings do not exclude microscopic spread and do not establish histologic or in vivo safety. They also do not establish safety or efficacy of the described injectate formulation at this target in living patients. This report should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating rather than evidence of clinical effectiveness or safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.