ArticleJournal of microscopy and ultrastructure
A New Approach for Diagnosing Oral Epithelial Dysplasia: A Proposal for a Novel Histopathological Scoring System.
Article in Journal of microscopy and ultrastructure. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) encompasses a range of architectural and cytological changes in epithelial tissue due to genetic alterations. Traditional grading methods for OED often suffer from subjectivity and lack numerical precision. Objective: This study aimed to develop a new scoring system to objectively grade OED based on architectural and cytological features. Materials and Methods: We analyzed 150 cases of OED from our institutional database. A scoring sheet was created to record the presence (score of 1) or absence (score of 0) of specific dysplastic features. Scores were categorized into three ranges: 1-4, 5-8, and 9-16. This new system was validated against the World Health Organization (WHO) Grading System and Binary System, with interobserver variability assessed using kappa statistical analysis. Results: Scores ranged from 1 to 4 for mild dysplasia, from 5 to 8 for moderate dysplasia, and from 9 to 16 for severe dysplasia ( Discussion: This novel scoring system addresses limitations of existing grading methods, such as subjectivity and variability. It offers a more objective approach to diagnosing and managing OED, potentially improving the early detection and prevention of oral squamous cell carcinoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.