ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2026
Development, validation and effectiveness of a parents led neuromotor training module with AI-based movement analysis for improving motor proficiency and sports participation in children with developmental coordination disorder: a protocol for an assessor-blinded randomized superiority controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Developmental Coordination Disorder (DCD) is a common neurodevelopmental condition characterized by impaired motor coordination, poor balance, reduced participation in physical activities, and limitations in functional performance. Conventional rehabilitation often requires prolonged therapist supervision and may not be consistently accessible, particularly in resource-limited settings. Parent-led rehabilitation and artificial intelligence (AI)-based movement analysis have emerged as promising approaches to enhance motor outcomes; however, evidence integrating these strategies remains limited. This manuscript presents the protocol for a randomized controlled trial evaluating a structured Parent-Led Neuromotor Training Programme integrated with AI-based movement analysis in children with DCD. Methods and analysis: This protocol describes an assessor-blinded, two-arm, parallel-group randomized superiority controlled trial involving 62 children aged 7-14 years diagnosed with DCD according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) criteria and scoring below the age-expected range on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children-Second Edition (MABC-2). Participants will be randomly allocated (1:1) to either an intervention group receiving a Parent-Led Neuromotor Training Programme integrated with AI-based movement analysis in addition to conventional physiotherapy or a control group receiving conventional physiotherapy alone. Parents will deliver supervised home-based training for 30-45 min per session, 5 days per week, for 12 weeks. Movement analysis will be performed using Google MediaPipe Pose, a validated markerless pose-estimation framework, to quantify joint kinematics, movement symmetry, coordination, movement smoothness, movement accuracy, movement speed, and task-completion time from standardized video recordings. The primary outcome will be motor proficiency, assessed using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition (BOT-2). Secondary outcomes will include AI-based movement metrics such as symmetry index, movement variability, and coordination score, as well as parental adherence, engagement, satisfaction, balance, and agility outcomes, parental adherence and satisfaction, and AI-derived movement metrics. The sample size was calculated to detect a clinically meaningful between-group difference with 80% power at a 5% significance level. Statistical analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle, with linear mixed-effects models used to compare repeated measurements between groups. Missing data will be handled using appropriate imputation methods where necessary. Clinical Trial Registration: https://ctri.nic.in/Clinicaltrials/regtrial.php?trialid=164461&EncHid=98252.11023&modid=1&compid=19 Identifier [CTRI/2026/06/112632].
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.