Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824877›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical policy and practice2026

Health system governance and pharmaceutical policy in Australia and Qatar: a comparative overview of access, reform, and equity.

Dina Abushanab, Daoud Al-Badriyeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dina AbushanabOffice of Vice President for Health & Medical Sciences, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4162-8617
Daoud Al-BadriyehCollege of Pharmacy, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7791-954X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This commentary contrasts the healthcare systems in Australia and Qatar, emphasising how each nation addresses shifting health policy priorities amid demographic pressures, financing reforms, and pharmaceutical challenges. Australia, with its established Medicare system and institutionalised Health Technology Assessment (HTA), continues to face issues related to equity, rural access, and the demands associated with an aging population. In contrast, Qatar is actively reforming its healthcare infrastructure to support a young and diverse expatriate-majority population, with increasing investments in insurance coverage, HTA integration, and private sector participation. Despite their differing levels of system maturity and population needs, both countries are tackling common issues: the rising burden of non-communicable diseases, cost pressures from innovative treatments, and the necessity of aligning expenditures with measurable health outcomes. The commentary highlights value-based healthcare as a shared goal while critically assessing the impact of pharmaceuticals, data infrastructure, and stakeholder engagement in promoting sustainable and equitable access. By integrating insights and policy reflections within a comparative framework, this commentary identifies opportunities for cross-national learning and outlines potential directions for future research and practice.

Indexed as

AustraliaHealthcare systempolicymakingpublicQatarvalue-based healthcare

Identifiers

PMID42824877
PMCPMC13629778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.