ArticleAdvances in radiation oncology2026
A Multimodal Machine Learning Model Combining Dosimetric and Radiomic Shape Features for Predicting Moderate‑to‑Severe Xerostomia After Radiation Therapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.
Article in Advances in radiation oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Radiation-induced xerostomia remains a frequent and debilitating complication in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma undergoing radiation therapy, severely impacting quality of life. Accurate prediction of xerostomia severity is crucial for personalized treatment planning. This study aimed to develop and validate a machine learning model that integrates dosimetric parameters with radiomic shape features from planning computed tomography images to predict moderate‑to‑severe xerostomia. Methods and Materials: In this retrospective study, we included 100 patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity modulated radiation therapy. Radiomic shape features were extracted from the overlap volume between the planning target volume and the left parotid gland. These were combined with standard dosimetric parameters (eg, V20 Gy and V30 Gy). A rigorous correlation-based feature selection was implemented to address multicollinearity. A random forest classifier was developed to predict xerostomia grade (grade 1 vs ≥grade 2), and its stability was rigorously assessed through 100 iterations of random train-test splitting. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, and confusion matrix analysis. Results: The model demonstrated moderate performance with modest variability in predicting moderate‑to‑severe xerostomia, achieving a mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (SD, 0.09) and an accuracy of 0.71 (SD, 0.09) across 100 random train‑test splits. Feature selection stability analysis identified 6 consistently important predictors: "Elongation," "Maximum2DDiameterSlice," "V20," "Flatness," "LeastAxisLength," and "MajorAxisLength." Radiomic shape features predominated among the most frequently selected and most influential parameters. Robust importance quantification further identified "V30," "MeshVolume," and "Sphericity" as the top contributors to the model's predictions. Conclusions: This study suggests a robust machine learning framework for predicting moderate‑to‑severe xerostomia, indicating the complementary value of radiomic shape features to traditional dosimetric metrics. The integration of these features may contribute to more comprehensive toxicity risk assessment and warrants further investigation in clinical decision-making contexts.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.