Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42824862›Full record

ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2026

Recruitment strategies for community-based pharmacy research.

Abigail G Shackley, Stefanie P Ferreri, Jennifer M Cavender, Kaileigh D Yen, Lori T Armistead, Delesha M Carpenter, Tamera D Hughes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Abigail G ShackleyEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 301 Pharmacy Ln, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Stefanie P FerreriEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 301 Pharmacy Ln, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Jennifer M CavenderEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 301 Pharmacy Ln, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Kaileigh D YenEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 301 Pharmacy Ln, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Lori T ArmisteadEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 301 Pharmacy Ln, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Delesha M CarpenterEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 301 Pharmacy Ln, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
Tamera D HughesEshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, 301 Pharmacy Ln, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.

Funding

FDA HHS U01 FD007857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rural communities are disproportionately burdened by opioid use disorder (OUD) and other opioid-related harms. Community pharmacies are an accessible health care touchpoint in rural areas and are well-positioned to provide prevention and treatment services. However, there is limited guidance on how to effectively engage rural pharmacies and patients in OUD research. Our objective is to describe research recruitment strategies for pharmacists and patients. Methods: We engaged a rural practice-based research network to recruit pharmacists and patients for surveys and interviews aimed at improving understanding of opioid overdose prevention and treatment services. To maximize survey completion and ensure diverse participation in interviews, we used a multi-modal strategy designed for pharmacists, including email, personalized survey QR codes with mailed gift baskets, and phone calls. Patient recruitment was pharmacist mediated. Results: With 78 of 150 pharmacists (52%) completing the survey, we met our response goal of 50%. Completed surveys varied by recruitment method, including 51 (65%) from email outreach and 19 (24%) from personalized QR codes with mailed gift baskets. Fifty-four of the 78 pharmacists who completed the survey (69%) expressed interest in the interview and purposive sampling resulted in 16 completed interviews. A total of 73 patients were interested in interviews. Of those, 46 were fully screened, 45 met eligibility, and 20 completed interviews. Conclusion: Successful recruitment for rural community pharmacists and patients for opioid-related research requires intentional, relationship-centered strategies. Multi-modal, low-burden contact improved rural pharmacist recruitment and pharmacists were key intermediaries for patient recruitment.

Indexed as

Community-based participatory researchCommunity pharmacy servicesPersonnel selectionPharmacy researchResearch subject recruitmentRural health services

Identifiers

PMID42824862
PMCPMC13628218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.