ReviewCureus2026
Oral Pigmentation in Children: A Narrative Review and Practical Diagnostic Framework.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral pigmentation in childhood ranges from common constitutional variants to less frequent reactive, local, medication-related, vascular, genetic, endocrine, and neoplastic disorders. Overlapping clinical appearances can create diagnostic uncertainty, especially when adult-oriented approaches are applied to children. This narrative review presents a pediatric-focused framework for initial evaluation based on five domains: onset and evolution; focal, multifocal, or diffuse distribution; color and surface morphology; blanching or compressibility; and medication, dental, family, environmental, and systemic clues. Longstanding, symmetric, diffuse brown pigmentation without symptoms usually favors constitutional melanin pigmentation. Multifocal lentigines with gastrointestinal, endocrine, skeletal, or family-history findings should prompt targeted evaluation for an underlying syndrome. Blue-gray lesions adjacent to a restoration or trauma site suggest exogenous pigment, whereas red-blue compressible lesions raise concern for a vascular process and should not undergo blind biopsy. Oral melanoacanthoma is an important benign mimic because it may enlarge rapidly and appear clinically alarming. New or changing focal lesions, particularly those showing nodularity, ulceration, spontaneous bleeding, marked asymmetry, irregular borders, color variegation, or diagnostic uncertainty, warrant prompt specialist assessment and histopathologic evaluation when indicated. Pediatric evidence remains limited and consists largely of observational studies, case reports or series, and extrapolation from adult literature; accordingly, the proposed pathway is an evidence-informed clinical aid rather than a validated prediction rule. A structured history-first approach can support appropriate reassurance, targeted referral, and timely biopsy while minimizing unnecessary intervention for convincingly benign pigmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.